UK
Property Auctions - Government Property Auctions - Property
Auctioneers - Local Authority Sales - Repossessions - Buy
to Let - Self-Build
Property - Rent & Rentals - Estate Agents - Real Estate
- Houses - Homes - Commercial - Investment Property
Auctions
can yield up a bargain
With house prices now out of reach for many - despite signs
the market is slowing in some areas - buyers are having to look
harder for bargains.
One alternative is to buy at auction, says Jane Hall.
A glance through the daytime television schedules reveals that
Britain is in the grip of auction fever, with programmes such
as Bargain Hunt, Cash In the Attic and Flog It highlighting
our love of a bargain.
This love affair shows no signs of abating.
But
for those hoping to emulate the likes of David Dickinson and
pick up a house "as cheap as chips", the auction
room can be a nerve-wracking place.
Yet a growing number of people are now looking to the auction
room as a means of getting their feet on the property ladder.
Buying at auction now accounts for an estimated 5pc and rising
of all property transactions, according to the Royal Institute
of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).
Recent
figures from online property database Focus show the value
of residential properties sold at auction during the first
six months of 2003 rose 12pc to £612m, helped by a 19.5pc
increase in the average value of residential lots to £113,599.
Buying at auction sounds like a dream, especially as the traditional
method takes an average of 12 weeks from the day an offer is
accepted until contracts are exchanged. During that time, buyers
can be gazumped or sellers may decide to stay put and chains
break.
Almost one agreed sale in three now never makes it to exchange
of contracts.
A big advantage for saleroom buyers is that once the auctioneer's
hammer falls, the property belongs to them and neither they nor
the seller can pull out. The buyer hands over a deposit and may
move in within 28 days.
Around 25,000 properties now go to auction every year at more
than 200 auction houses nationwide.
Such sales - which are the norm in the United States and Australia
- really took off in the UK in the 1990s when lenders were having
to sell-off property they had repossessed, often at a loss, but
couldn't sell on the open market. They became a magnet for buyers
who wanted to take advantage of the lower prices and pick up
a bargain.
Although there has been a reduction in the number of auctions
being held as the property market has picked up and fewer homes
are being repossessed, they are still going. And they still attract
bargain hunters.
The reason why auctions still produce mark-downs is simple.
Most properties being sold at auction are there for one reason.
Their owners - and this includes lenders with repossessions on
their hands - need a quick sale and are therefore often prepared
to accept offers well below the market value.
But despite the financial advantages of buying property at auction,
many people are wary of doing so. Not for the faint-hearted,
an auction room is an unfamiliar environment for most and is
certainly not a conventional way to buy a home.
As a result, it is seen by many to be a risky business. This
is not actually the case, says Andrew Entwhistle, associate partner
of surveyors and valuers George F White, which has offices in
Alnwick and Wolsingham and holds between 10 and 15 property auctions
across the region every year.
"There are two golden rules for buying at auction," Andrew
says. "The first is to do your homework and get an answer
to every question you have before the auction. This may cost
you, but it will be cash well spent.
"The
second is to go to the auction with a fixed price in your head
and to stick to it. If you follow those rules, buying at auction
need be no more risky than going through an estate agent."
While
George F White usually deals in properties with what Andrew
describes as the "wow factor," and buyers who pay in
cash, he says in general there can be bargains for the taking
at auctions.
"A
lot depends on who is there on the day bidding, and how the
property has been marketed. If it hasn't been marketed well
or the seller wants to get rid of it quickly, then there is
a possibility you will get a bargain.
"In
the current elevated housing market, auctions are preferred
by many. It is a transparent way to buy. You have the advantage
of being able to inspect all the deeds, searches and contracts
beforehand."
Richard
Francis, head of auctions at estate agent Keith Pattinson,
says: "Every month it staggers me that, while some properties
go for more than anticipated, many go for much less.
"We are attracting first time buyers and those looking
to trade-up as well as investors, and have properties across
all price ranges, from £1,000 to £750,000."
Andrew
Entwhistle throws cold water on the idea that an auctioneer
may mistake a twitch or a cough for a bid. "A property auction
is not like a lamb sale where a sneeze will buy you a whole flock.
At a property auction you generally have to wave your arms around
very strongly. However, my advice would be if you're not wanting
to bid, keep your arms folded."
A more common problem is bidding for the wrong lot. Make sure
you know exactly which lot you want and which lot the auctioneer
is taking bids on.
You should also check that the property is still up for auction
and hasn't been sold privately.
So while buying at auction can be nerve-wracking, it need be
no more risky than buying through an estate agent.
The only difference is that the selling price will be determined
by the amount of competition bidders are prepared to offer.
Most people who buy at auction are cash buyers who already have
finance available. But some inexperienced buyers do venture into
the auction market. If you decide to do so, then you must be
certain that your finance is in place before making an offer.
The auction catalogues are released usually two to four weeks
before the sale and give a guide to prices, so you will know
roughly how much you will need. But remember that the final price
may be higher, particularly if there are several bidders for
the property.
The most important point to remember about this pre-auction
planning is that all of the paperwork, surveys, searches, and
financing must be carried out before the auction itself.
But one of the major advantages is that the purchase goes through
very quickly, therefore you bypass problems like chains or a
long wait while the vendor finds a suitable property to move
to.
Five good reasons to buy a property now
By Nic Cicutti, MSN Money special correspondent
House prices might be reaching their peak but if you want to
get into the house buying market now may still be the ideal time
Suddenly, like the first falling leaf at the end of a long summer,
a few tremors are being felt in the housing market.
Surveys appear to show that property prices, for so long a one-way
bet, are beginning to stall. In a few areas, it is being whispered,
they are even falling.
The very horror of it! What on earth will we talk about at dinner
parties now?
The practical consequence of scare stories is that, understandably,
they are likely to put some people off buying their own homes.
They will opt to rent instead.
Switching to renting a home may not be wise
Indeed, some existing homeowners are actively discussing the
possibility of selling up, renting for a year or two and then
buying back into the market again when prices have fallen.
Now, I’'m
all for personal freedom of choice in these matters. If you
want to incur costs of up to 3% when selling your home, plus
many thousands more - including stamp duty of up to 4% - to
buy one back, be my guest. You are obviously gambling on prices
falling by at least 10%, probably nearer 20%, in very quick
order.
But as far
as I’'m concerned, people should keep buying.
Not if you can’'t afford to, of course: in that case you
ought to rent instead.
My own rough
guideline is that you should never be paying more than 35%
of your monthly take-home income on a mortgage –- and
you should also factor in the potential cost to you of
mortgage rates moving up by 2% in your affordability calculations.
But if you CAN afford to buy and are wondering whether you should
bother, here are five good reasons you should take the plunge.
1) Property is NOT an investment
In the past few years we have become used to the idea that property
is an asset, in exactly the same way as the shares we hold in
our pension fund or an ISA are assets.
That's
simply not true. And here's
why:
You mainly buy a property because, at the end of the day, it
provides a roof over your head. Whether it goes up or down in
price should not really matter to you. As long as you like it,
you can make the repayments and want to live in that area, nothing
else really matters.
The only way you will "really make money" out of
it is if you decide to sell up at some stage and keep the profits,
or downsize and do the same.
True, a growing proportion of people do downsize. According
to research from Assertahome, an online property finding
firm, one
in three house sales involve people selling up to move to a
smaller property.
However, some 54% of those who downsize (average age 46), make
the decision primarily to get rid of their mortgage, not because
they want equity from their property as cash in hand. A further
15% are doing so because they have split up from their partners.
Not much cash in hand there either.
Some 20% are retirees over 60. They too are looking to clear
their mortgage - not surprising, given that they have an average
annual income of £23,500. Only 12% of those who buy a smaller
property (4% of the total number of buyers) actually take the
cash - and even then they often "recycle" it, giving
their children a leg up the property ladder instead.
In other words, property is not the cash-generative machine
many people think it might be. And even when it is, the period
between
buying and selling can last for 20 years or longer.
2) Property IS a good long-term investment
Confused? Allow me to explain.
Even though a home SHOULD be treated primarily as a shelter
and not an investment, no-one likes to buy a property, or anything
else for that matter, only to discover that it is worth far less
than they paid for it only a couple of years before.
Oddly enough,
this feeling doesn’'t stop people splashing
out on a brand new car - despite knowing that the minute
it gets driven off a garage forecourt it will lose up to 35%
of its purchase price.
But in the case of our homes, it is still nice to feel validated
by the right choice, particularly as it is the largest financial
purchase most of us are likely to make in our lifetimes.
In fact,
evidence suggests that while property doesn’'t
perform as well as shares over the long term, it does generally
retain its value over the years.
The Halifax
has been publishing its survey of house prices since 1983.
Back then, the average UK property cost just under £30,000.
Today, it is worth just under £160,000.
You can download an excel file of this data from the www.hbosplc.com
website
Nationwide’'s survey, which dates back to 1952, shows a
similar set of figures. By the way, the average price of a property
back then was £1,891 - and the average wage stood at £489.
You can download an excel of this data from the www.nationwide.co.uk
website
Have prices
kept pace with inflation over this period? Nationwide’'s
survey uses 1957 as its starting point and looks at what
you could have bought with the money used to buy a house back
then.
Moving forward 47 years, prices have outstripped inflation five
times over.
You can download an excel file of this data from the www.nationwide.co.uk
website
Equally, there have been long periods when, despite the fact
that prices were rising, inflation eroded a significant part
of those increases.
The trick with property is not to focus on the short-term but
look ahead at least 25 to 30 years - roughly the amount of time
it takes most of us to pay off our mortgage!
By the way, although changes in the property market happen with
the speed of a huge tanker turning in the Channel, certainly
when compared with shares, what is also true is that the recovery
of prices in the mid-1990s was fairly rapid.
Up to mid-1994 they were still falling. But in the period between
September 1994 and June 1995, they rose 8%. Miss out on that
and you would regret it.
3) Negative equity is nothing to worry about
Every story about the last property market collapse focuses
on what happened between 1989 and 1995, when prices collapsed.
Millions of people found themselves paying off mortgages that
were greater than the value of the homes they were living in.
In some cases, the disparity was upwards of 30% and I personally
know a couple whose flat plummeted by 50% in value over that
period.
At the same
time, hundreds of thousands of people had their homes repossessed.
They were unable to pay their mortgages and, in many cases,
would symbolically march into their lenders’' offices,
hand over the front door keys and walk out again.
For them, the early 1990s were a miserable period.
But there is a danger of confusing things here: it was not negative
equity that led to repossessions but a sharp economic downturn
during which unemployment rocketed, coupled with high inflation,
when interest rates shot up to 15% at one point.
For those who were able to continue paying off their home loans,
negative equity was an unfortunate fact of life, but changed
little: they were still able to live in the homes they had bought.
The major problems were faced by those who, mainly for work
reasons but also in cases where couples split up, found themselves
wanting to move but were unable to do so.
Lenders reacted by launching mortgage products on the market
that allowed borrowers keen to move to do so.
Of course,
a significant effect of negative equity was that there were
pockets where prices fell more dramatically. This was either
because they had bought “starter” homes
(little better than bedsits) that no-one wanted, or because
they lived in parts of the country that were badly affected
by worsening economic conditions.
But for the
rest of us –- I was there too - if our £50,000
homes dropped in value to £40,000, the chances were that
the one we were hoping to step up to had dropped by a similar
percentage.
So moving was not impossible, just a lot more difficult.
4) Demographics are on your side
Prices of residential property are partly fuelled by mass psychology,
as we know.
It is easy,
when prices are booming, for individuals to make "rash" decisions,
paying higher and higher prices because they think that unless
they do, they will have to pay even more, further down the
line.
But there is also a fundamental shortage of residential property
in the UK, which few experts believe is likely to be resolved
in the next decade or so. If anything, it could get worse.
The recent Barker Review of the UK property market, carried
out on behalf of the Treasury, makes the point clearly:
In 2002,
the last year for which figures are available, around 183,000
houses were built in the UK, 138,000 of which in England. Taking
into account of demolitions and conversions, the net number
of new homes was 134,000, a 0.6% increase in the UK’'s
housing stock. This is more or less in line with homebuilding
trends in recent years.
Official projections of "household formation", the
number of singles or couples who require a home for themselves,
indicate that the number of households in England alone is
expected to increase by an average of 155,000 a year over the
1996 to 2021 period. In the 10 years to 2000, household formation
is estimated to have been an average 196,000 households a year.
In other words, each year the number of homes built is about
20,000 less than what is needed.
For more information on the Barker report go to the www.hm-treasury.gov.uk
website
The Council of Mortgage Lenders, which has also researched the
issue, suggests:
By 2021 there are projected to be 2.1 million more married people
in England, counterbalanced by 5 million more single adults and
a further 1.5 million divorced.
Most of the net increase in household numbers comes from one-person
households, with the number of married couples more than compensated
for by an increase in the number of co-habiting households.
Obviously, a key driver for household formation is the relationship
between income and affordability - what a person earns, relative
to prices in the market.
If, as has been happening, the multiple of income to property
prices rises from 3.5 to nearer 5 times earnings, many people
will not be forming households: they will live at home or in
rented accommodation.
However, that suggests prices are more likely to remain static
for some time, rather than fall.
5) You can be your own master (or mistress)
Think about it: the chances are that if you live in rented accommodation,
you have surrendered any decision about how the place should
look to your landlord.
Because he or she is after an easy life, you probably have a
nice white or beige colour scheme, with decently ordinary sofas
and armchairs, a reasonably comfortable bed and appliances that
work, for the most part.
Deep down,
you yearn for something uniquely yours, where you can express
your own personality rather than suffer someone else’'s
commercially-determined blandness.
You want
lime-green walls with cerise curtains, rubber flooring and,
yes, a genuine avocado colour bathroom suite. Oh, and don’'t
forget the parachute, dyed black and strategically hanging,
fully open, over your water bed.
If you rent,
you will never really be able to decide how you live. If you
buy your own property, you will never have to put up with someone
else‘'s good taste again.
Which is why I repeat: as long as you can afford it, you should
consider buying regardless of the doomsayers who warn that property
prices are set to collapse. They are probably wrong. But even
if they are, you will be having a lot more fun waiting for the
market to turn than them.